Since when did Canadians become complacent with the abysmal dirty politics of Bill O'Rielly and Ann Coulter: which subscribe to the school of he who yells the loudest has the correct opinion? That disregard the policies and instead attack the personal character of their opponents. When did Canadians decide that policies were less important than personality? At the end of the day we’re finding someone to run the country not the guy we can "sit down and have a beer with" as one American described why she voted for George W. Bush instead of John Kerry. It seems when we talk about politics today the party policies is an inconsequential issue that hangs in the dark smoky back rooms of party politics not public politics. The only polices that gain attention are those that contain buzz words like tax, environment, or crime. Furthermore, it seems that if the conservatives had their way we would toss away party policies, lock the party leaders in a room with a live feed to CPAC, give each leader a bucket of mud and watch them sling it at each other: whichever party leader is cleanest on the way out the door becomes prime minister. This week the conservatives have begun there work of creating attack ads against liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, because according to The Toronto Star a conservative insider told the media, the liberals are rising in the polls and furthermore, he/she went on to say that they were worried that they had waited too long to begin attacking the liberal leader and had lost their chance to brand him in a negative light. They are wading through a lifetime of writings transcripts and television shows that Ignatieff has been on or hosted to find dirt they can use. Politics should not be personal they are political. Our national parties should be debating policies that affect the nation not what they do after hours. I am not saying there isn’t a very large part of politics which is the court of public opinion, however, it is the role of the media and the voter to formulate opinions not paid political spin doctors. Parties should be attacking policy and providing viable alternatives to gain votes not attacking the personal character of its opponents. The money, time, resources and great minds of the conservative party, which could be working on policies to fix the economy, to fight crime in Vancouver and elsewhere in Canada, mind's that could be used to help alleviate wait times in hospitals, solving poverty are being wasted to attack the personal character of a man that is serving his country: great minds relinquished to the level of tabloid journalists.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Thursday, November 27, 2008
The Wolf Smells Blood: Conservatives go for the Kill
In the past week we have seen the largest attack on Canadian Democracy in living memory. In the economic update The Prime Minister broke his promise to drop the partisan politics and work with opposition parties to help Canada navigate through the economic uncertainty we are seeing. Harper moved to bankrupt the Liberals while cripple the NDP, the greens and the Bloc: Harper moved to destroy the opposition parties for it is impossible to run a political campaign without significant dollars. He wouldn't compromise so he decided to get rid of them. How does forcing the people to support their political parties in cash strapped times help create jobs and increase the welfare of this nation. Conservatives tout that they are sacrificing the most when in fact they reap the rewards of the grass roots fundraising organizations created by the Reform party giving them the largest war chest of any current Canadian Political party: as was demonstrated in their ability to broadcast massive attack adds against the opposition parties this week, as well as in the last election. Harper seems to have forgotten he is governing a minority government. Meaning a majority of Canadians did not vote for him but the opposition. Harper bashed the Liberals for not standing up to him in the last parliament and now that have stood up for the people that elected them he bashes them as conniving and only grasping for power. It is partisan politicians like Harper that give politicians a bad name.
Furthermore, Harper offered nothing to help the economy in his economic update. It was not until he realized the opposition might actually stand up to him that began to compromise. Short months ago he told Canadians that if we were going to see a recession it would have already happened and that there were some good deals on the stock markets at the time, telling Canadians they should invest. What were Canadians suppose to invest with when they just watched vast amounts of their life savings vanish overnight.
Only Harper could call this current situation undemocratic: two political parties setting aside their difference to offer real tangible help to working Canadians. He forgets to mention he tried to make a coalition government when the Liberals under Paul Martin were floundering. However, if someone else offers to run a coalition government he is not a part of is unthinkable. The Prime minister governs with the grace of the Canadian people and a majority of Canadians voted to be represented by the opposition parties. These opposition parties represent the people of Canada and if the opposition parties have lost confidence in current government then in our parliamentary system this means the people of Canada have lost confidence in the government. Although I do not fully agree with this coalition in its current form it is the way in which our parliamentary system operates and as such must be respected.
Monday, October 27, 2008
There is a Problem With Our Education System
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Fiscal Situation
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Leadership Review Needed
Many suspected from the beginning of this election campaign its ultimate result; it seemed all one could do is put up one hell of a fight, hope for the best and wait for the damage report to come in. The Liberal party was in disarray: fractured over leadership and policy. However, now that the election is over and we have tallied the results there is no time to waste. Liberals will have to regroup and soon. The longer the Liberals are in disarray the longer they will stay in opposition. For Harper knows he has no real opponent until than and knows the liberals will not risk another election till they are ready.
Politics is neither fair nor accommodating. It is a game that has no rules and many judges. Sometimes even with the best intentions the best policies and the better vision things do not go your way and there is nothing that can be done. Sacrifices have to be made for the betterment of the country. The fact that Stephane Dion could not communicate effectively to a majority of the voting public represents one of these cruel realities. Public perception wins elections. Nothing more nothing less, it is not your policies but how the public perceives your policies, not your character but your perceived character. It is not that Mr. Dion is a bad politician I have the fullest respect and admiration for his political abilities, the fact is that he is not a national leader, a national face of a party, as we saw in the results from last night. One of the most valuable attributes an individual can have is recognizing their strengths and their weaknesses so that they can apply themselves to the best of their ability where they can make the most meaningful contribution. It is not his fault it is the fact that politics is the result of perception and because of this cruel reality, sacrifices have to be made and one must adapt.
If the liberals wait till the spring to have a leadership review how long before a leader is decided. How long would this new leader have to appeal to the Canadian public? Is this fair to the new leader?